野兽之道

Australia's defense‑funded report hypes risks to subsea cables to 'serve military goals'_我的网站

秦时丽人明月心

A |     快科技8月24日消息,据媒体报道,近日,上海黄浦区一企业向黄浦警方报案称某自媒体博主发布内容为“知名企业上市失败”的不实帖文,对公司声誉造成负面影响。黄浦公安分局网安部门接报后迅速开展调查,锁定了该账号运营者莫某。

B |     

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT
    Illustration: Liu Rui/GTA new report funded by Australia's Department of Defense played up security risks to submarine cables in the Indo-Pacific waters and pointed finger at China and some other countries over alleged undersea‑cable attacks in recent years, while claiming threats against subsea cables are growing. A Chinese expert said that accusing China without conclusive evidence constitutes "over‑securitization" made by Australian side, as well as a calculated pretext for its own military expansion.
Published by the National Security College at the Australian National University (ANU), the paper claimed recent damage to cables in the Baltic Sea and around China's Taiwan region suggests "state actors are now actively probing and testing cable infrastructure in peacetime as part of broader hybrid warfare strategies" to rapidly degrade connectivity at the outset of a conflict, The Australian reported.
The paper claimed 16 privately owned subsea cables that carry 99 percent of Australia's internet traffic are a "high priority target" for Australia's adversaries that could be severed in a conflict, threatening the nation's economy and social fabric, according to The Australian.
The report singled out China and Russia for blame, saying that there have been multiple apparent attacks on submarine cables in recent years in European waters as well as near China's Taiwan region, suspected to be linked to Russia and China, the Straits Times reported.
However, the report cites a 2025 voyage by Chinese research vessel Tan Suo Yi Hao along Australia's western and southern coastlines as evidence to back its claim that "potential adversaries are actively gathering information about Australia's cable infrastructure."
This report, relying on the routine scientific operations of a Chinese research vessel in 2025 to level allegations of offensive actions against China, and employing ambiguous terminology such as "suspected" and "potential," demonstrates Australia's evidentiary leap, Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday.
This erroneous claim was refuted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry at the time. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on March 31, 2025 that China carries out normal activities at sea in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS. 
"We hope Australia will have a right understanding of this and stop the groundless suspicion and speculations," Guo added.
This is not the first time certain Australian politicians has leveled baseless accusations of China intending to sabotage its undersea cables. Back in May, Defense Minister Richard Marles claimed during the Shangri-La Dialogue that China ought to boost transparency around its maritime operations. He also asserted that a surge in damage to subsea cables had transformed the seabed into a "battlefield," per The Australian.
Chen said Australian side's scaremongering is tied to its predictive threat‑perception framework forged in recent years. This framework designates China and other countries as strategic competitors in advance, subsequently forces routine scientific activities into a confrontational framework, Chen said.
Apart from unfounded allegations against China, the paper claims Australia's defense military "must incorporate the defense of submarine cable infrastructure into its operational planning," according to The Australian.
It added the government should also consider up¬grading an auxiliary ship operated by the navy, ADV Guidance, to enable it to repair damaged cables.
The vast majority of submarine cable damages are caused by accidental factors such as fishing operations and vessel anchoring, rather than deliberate sabotage. For suspected cases of intentional damage, independent technical investigation bodies should be established, and the principle of "investigate first, characterize later" should be strictly applied, so as to prevent ordinary maritime accidents from escalating into diplomatic conflicts, Chen said.
The core problem of Australian side's submarine cable security lies entirely with itself. Instead of addressing its own infrastructure shortcomings and improving its domestic protection and maintenance systems, the Australian side has chosen to continually exaggerate external threats and stoke bloc confrontation, the expert added.
Chen said that by fabricating alleged Chinese threats, Australian side seeks to "rationalize" its military spending increases and underwater force expansion. The submarine digital infrastructure originally meant to serve global development has been labeled along us versus them lines, and this constitutes the biggest hidden danger, he added.
。经查,莫某在网上看到相关公司诉讼纠纷的信息,抱着博眼球的心态、在并未核实真伪的情况下,杜撰“企业上市失败”随后发布在证券投资平台。相关帖文被社交平台自媒体引用、转发,造成一定恶劣影响。最终,莫某因虚构事实扰乱秩序的违法行为被黄浦警方依法处以行政拘留处罚。同时,责令其删除相关内容并进行澄清。    报道还称,经过记者多方核实获悉,该平台企业为小红书。7月下旬,有较多传言称“小红书已于6月底前秘密提交IPO申请”,但因前员工举报其“上市合规”问题而受阻。对此,小红书方面回应:目前流传的IPO相关信息均不属实。

C |     另据了解,今年以来,上海黄浦警方以打造清朗有序营商网络环境为目标,以“广宣传、深发现、严打击、强治理”为工作主线,深入推进打击整治涉企网络谣言等违法犯罪专项行动。截至目前,黄浦分局网安部门已累计侦破涉企网络违法犯罪案件20余起,依法清理涉企网络谣言信息1500余条,关停违法违规账号4.9万余个。其中“知名美妆用品企业关闭所有门店”“某品牌啤酒被检出致癌物”等不实信息发布人都受到了相应的行政处罚。

Current article:http://ncp1isn.wengsengzhanhuangu.cyou/news/20260826_679469.html

Published on:03:40:27